Is Globalization The Future For A Safer Humanity And World Peace?
POLITICS /
K. Venkateshwar Rao
3 OCTOBER 2019
3 OCTOBER 2019
In this age of globalization, big and small
organizations are forming strategic alliances and following the policy of
mergers and acquisitions to strengthen their position in the business world.
Globalization has proved to be a boon for not only organizations that seek to
expand their business but also for small organizations that could not withstand
the challenges of big organizations or lack finance for their expansion
activities. Due to governments’ restriction and protection to domestic
industries, multinational organizations are restricted from direct entry in a
foreign land. Therefore, they enter into strategic alliances with small
organizations and expand their reach, and small organizations enter such
alliances to benefit in terms of technology transfer and finance. Thus,
globalization is a win-win situation for both small and large companies.
Similarly, the global community and
superpowers have to ponder over the issue– should globalization be merely
confined to the corporate world or extended to the political arena and
countries for global peace and harmony? Shouldn’t unstable nations consider
mergers with their parent nations, such as North Korea with South Korea,
Pakistan with India, and so on? Just as the alliance of North Germany and West
Germany proved a boon for people of both the nations, the merger of North Korea
with South Korea and Pakistan with India could ensure development, peace, and
tranquillity in the respective countries The global community and superpowers
cannot sit idle and be a meek spectator to nuclear threats and blackmails of
Pakistan and North Korea.
It may be recalled that Pakistan was created
by the British as a theological state based on the two-nation theory—that
Hindus and Muslims must comprise two separate nations. But the past 70 years
proved that a modern society could not be based on religion, and only
secularism can work in the India sub-continent. The result of a theocratic
state (Pakistan) in which chaos and religious extremism are prevailing is clear
for all to see. The question is how long the world can watch religious violence
in Quetta, Karachi, Kashmir, etc.? How long must our people pay to buy billions
of dollars of foreign arms to fight each other?
Pakistan is the only Muslim-majority state to
have successfully developed nuclear weapons. It is the epicentre of global
jihadism and home to jihadist group Harakat-ul-Mujahideen and Muslim
fundamentalist groups — al‑Qaeda, the Haqqani network, and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Jihadist organizations have support from the government. In addition to having
hosted bin Laden, Pakistan has been the foremost supplier of nuclear technology
to rogue states, like North Korea and Iran.
For North Korea’s totalitarian regime, the
nuclear arms policy has twin objectives of developing nuclear weapons and
improving the nation’s economy. North Korea has proliferated its nuclear and
missile capabilities as a bargaining tool to secure political and economic
incentives from the rest of the world because nobody can risk its misadventures
against South Korea, Japan, and notably the United States.
Pakistan and North Korea– the two close allies
are the main actors in destabilizing the global peace in the two regions of
Asia— Kashmir in South Asia and on the other end of the Asian continent — the
Korean peninsula. Both the nations are authoritarian
countries, firmly controlled by their respective militaries. They not only
possess nuclear weapons, but also their heads of the governments have
emphatically declared to use them against South Korea, Japan, USA, and India,
showing utter disdain to the concept of responsibility.
Larry Pressler, former chairman of the
US Senate’s Arms Control Subcommittee termed both Pakistan and North Korea as
rogue states. He said, “Pakistan is more dangerous than North Korea as it does
not have a centralized command on its nuclear weapons, making them vulnerable
to theft and sale.” Pressler feared that a takeover of nuclear weapons by a
militant group during a period of instability or splintering of the state might
prove catastrophic for the world.
Both Pakistan and North Korea appear to be
blackmailing the world to listen to them and finance them, lest they use their
weapons of mass destruction.
According to political observers and diplomats,
India and North Korea reunification is an idea to save the world from nuclear
holocaust. This idea must be spread by all patriotic people in the subcontinent,
and elsewhere.
Political leaders of India such as the late
Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee talked of undivided India.
Additionally, Ram Madhav, BJP general secretary said, “The
RSS still believes that one day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh through widespread
goodwill, will again come together and Akhand (undivided) Bharat will be
created.” Recently, RSS leader Indresh Kumar echoed the same sentiment. Indresh
Kumar said that Pakistan would be a part of India after 2025. An
undivided India on the lines of the European Union might take shape.
Home Minister Rajnath Singh during an
election rally at Haridwar, on February 5, 2017, spoke of a referendum in
Pakistan to check whether its citizens desire to merge with India.
Many people across India and Pakistan say that
India was divided in 1947, and much has changed since then. But it is also a
fact that Germany was united in 1990 after being divided for 45 years. Vietnam
was united in 1975 after being separated for 30 years. Italy was united in
1861.
The main problems of India, Pakistan, and
North Korea are the same — poverty, unemployment, and lack of healthcare and
good education, among others. If reunited, resources can be pooled. These
problems can be overcome in 15-20 years. Billions of dollars spent annually on
purchasing arms can be used for people’s welfare.
Failures of nuclear-powered nations mean a
threat to the entire humanity. It’s high time that the global community and the
superpowers understand the essence of globalization and take the initiative in
the direction of the merger to prevent the world from potential nuclear
catastrophe. Is Globalization The Future For A Safer Humanity And World Peace?
Comments